bipartisanship
Yesterday I attended an invigorating talk by Van Jones, the founder of Green for All, an organization that simultaneously addresses the issues of lifting people out of poverty and moving America towards a cleaner and more environmentally responsible future (see the Jan 12, 2009 issue of The New Yorker for a great piece by Elizabeth Kolbert about Jones). In Jones' vision of a green collar economy, unemployed people in need of marketable skills will be trained to install solar panels (something already being done by Solar Richmond in the poverty-stricken community of Richmond, CA that currently relies on the polluting Chevron oil refinery for its livelihood), and car companies will be able to keep factory workers employed by manufacturing wind turbines (Jones points out, "It's called General Motors, not General SUV!"). If you have heard Obama mention the green collar economy, it is only because of Jones' efforts.
During the Q & A session, a woman asked Jones a question that had recently been weighing on my mind also: Why are the Democrats having so much trouble pushing through their legislation when the Republicans were able to pass so much controversial legislation without 60 Senate seats? Jones replied simply and seriously, "Because [the Republicans] are assholes." The room packed with Berkeleyans donning their scruffy beards and hiking boots bursted into uproarious laughter. Glen was not so amused when I recounted the punchline to him later in the night.
Jones' response could be taken as a crass comment playing to a hippie, left-wing crowd (as Glen did), but it was laden with truth just as many of Jon Stewart's jokes cleverly shove the obvious truth in our faces. I explained to Glen that the Democrats cared about America enough to compromise with the Republicans and pass legislation that they may not have entirely agreed with because the pros outweighed the cons. In contrast, the Republicans are obstinate and unwilling to see that more good will come out of quickly passing an economic stimulus bill with an emphasis on spending than digging their heels into the ground until the Democrats give in, by which time many more Americans will have lost their jobs and gone homeless or hungry. The Republicans basically gave Obama the cold shoulder when he literally crossed the aisle and attempted to achieve bipartisanship. If there aren't tax cuts in the bill, then the bill can do no good for America.
Here's a question for you: what's the difference between spending and tax cuts? Either way you won't have that $790 billion in your pocket. I don't trust that if you give tax cuts to hapless Americans or greedy corporations, they'll be able to use that money wisely to rescue America from this recession. How does that translate into more job creation than spending money on education, research, and other programs that will prepare Americans for the jobs of the future and support the innovation to bring future prosperity to America?
Jones went on to give an analogy that frankly confused me until he reached the punchline. In paraphrase, he said, "Imagine I walk up to a woman on the street and say, 'Please date me. I will be the best boyfriend you ever had.' The woman replies, 'No! I don't even know you or like you!' What do you think of this situation? It's just strange behavior on my part! Similarly, Obama is going to the Republicans and saying, 'I want to work with you to pass bipartisan legislation,' but the Republicans are responding with, 'Go away! I don't even like you!' Now that is just strange behavior on Obama's part to keep going back to the Republicans! He can't achieve bipartisanship if the Republicans won't have any of it."
I truly hope that the tough passage of the economic stimulus bill does not foreshadow what we'll witness on Capitol Hill for the next four years.



Comments [3]